<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9">
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/infovaticana-murr-bugnini-freemason-interpol</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T15:06:34Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Charles Murr afferma che l&apos;Interpol ha confermato che Bugnini era massone. Non è stata pubblicata alcuna prova in tal senso</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/return-to-tradition-communion-in-hand-interfaith-marriage-pius-xii</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T15:06:32Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Return to Tradition ha ragione su Pio XII e sull’“antiquarismo”, ma sbaglia sulla comunione in mano</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/montagna-roche-latin-mass-availability</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:32Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Quanto è accessibile la messa tradizionale? La sfida di Diane Montagna al cardinale Roche, verificata</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/novus-ordo-watch-hennick-sspx-papacy-sedevacantism</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:31Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Novus Ordo Watch dice che la FSSPX distorce il papato. Roma ha detto qualcosa di simile, ma la sua risposta è opposta</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/onepeterfive-who-is-excommunicated-sspx-decree</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:29Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>A chi ha scomunicato il decreto del 2 luglio? Verifica di un articolo di OnePeterFive sul testo</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/return-to-tradition-strickland-vincent-of-lerins-development</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:27Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Return to Tradition legge san Vincenzo di Lérins sulla dottrina, ma sbaglia secolo e catechismi</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/sspx-consecrations-not-schismatic-jurisdiction-argument</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:26Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>«Non un atto scismatico»? Valutare l&apos;argomento giurisdizionale sulle consacrazioni della FSSPX</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/strickland-i-have-not-moved-vatican-ii-continuity</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:24Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>‘I have not moved’: il criterio del vescovo Strickland per il Vaticano II, accostato ai testi della Chiesa stessa</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/sspx-state-of-necessity-argument-2026</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:23Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>La tesi dello «stato di necessità» per le consacrazioni FSSPX del 2026, messa a confronto con la linea della Santa Sede</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/sspx-sanctions-objectively-unjust-and-invalid-claim</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-12T08:30:21Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>La FSSPX definisce le sue scomuniche «oggettivamente ingiuste e invalide»: che cosa mostrano il decreto e i documenti</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/leo-xiv-death-penalty-post-catechism-2267</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-10T20:44:17Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Il messaggio di Leone XIV sulla pena di morte ripete il Catechismo quasi parola per parola</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/return-to-tradition-mutsaerts-abandon-parishes-find-tlm</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-10T20:44:16Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Mons. Mutsaerts ha detto «andate dove la liturgia è in ordine», Novus Ordo compreso, non solo la Messa tradizionale</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://it.tradwatch.org/analysis/return-to-tradition-antichrist-prophecy-imprimatur-culleton</loc>
    <news:news>
      <news:publication>
        <news:name>TradWatch</news:name>
        <news:language>it</news:language>
      </news:publication>
      <news:publication_date>2026-10-10T20:43:24Z</news:publication_date>
      <news:title>Un imprimatur non è un sigillo su una profezia, e il libro di Culleton sull’Anticristo ha 75 anni, non 100</news:title>
    </news:news>
  </url>
</urlset>
